[midPoint] R: R: Re: Reevaluate entitlement association
Pavol Mederly
mederly at evolveum.com
Fri Sep 8 23:20:47 CEST 2017
I'd try this one:
https://pastebin.com/MUYd9xBz
<outbound>
*<strength>strong</strength>*
<expression>
<associationFromLink>
<projectionDiscriminator>
<kind>entitlement</kind>
<intent>group</intent>
</projectionDiscriminator>
</associationFromLink>
</expression>
</outbound>
But it's a bit of guess.
Pavol Mederly
Software developer
evolveum.com
On 08.09.2017 23:15, Marco Benucci wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have created my entitlements using this schema object in my resource
>
> https://pastebin.com/zkJkwS73
>
> and an object synchronization like this
>
> https://pastebin.com/axrzXbc2
>
> the template used in sync is the following
>
> https://pastebin.com/MUYd9xBz
>
> Moreover, I have an association in the account schemaHandling
>
> https://pastebin.com/bDsHu38V
>
> This is basically what is described in
> https://wiki.evolveum.com/display/midPoint/Active+Directory+Group+Synchronization+HOWTO
>
> Where should I put the mapping’s strenght?
>
> Thank you,
> Marco
>
> *Da: *Pavol Mederly <mailto:mederly at evolveum.com>
> *Inviato: *venerdì 8 settembre 2017 22:50
> *A: *midpoint at lists.evolveum.com <mailto:midpoint at lists.evolveum.com>
> *Oggetto: *Re: [midPoint] R: Re: Reevaluate entitlement association
>
> Hello Marco,
>
> I assume your entitlements are created using account constructions
> containing mappings. The behavior on recompute/reconcile depends on
> the strength of those mappings and on the tolerance level set on
> target associations (and attributes).
>
> Generally, strength=normal (read "relative") means the mappings are
> put into action on a value change. Recompute/reconcile does *not*
> trigger them.
>
> If you want to be sure your mapping is employed on
> recompute/reconcile, you have to mark it as strength=strong.
>
> See
> https://wiki.evolveum.com/display/midPoint/Mapping#Mapping-MappingStrength.
>
> Also you can enable logging and see what mappings are triggered, and,
> generally, what's going on when you run recompute.
>
> See https://wiki.evolveum.com/display/midPoint/Troubleshooting+Mappings.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pavol Mederly
> Software developer
> evolveum.com
>
> On 08.09.2017 19:56, Marco Benucci wrote:
>
> Sorry for not have specified this before, but recompute seems not
> to work. Neither the checkbox on the user page neither a bulk with
> the recompute action...
>
> No errors are showed by the way.
>
> We have planned the update asap, but before doing that we have a
> bunch of more urgent requests...
>
> Anyway, should be this the expected behavior?
>
> If an account on AD is not in a given group, but his/her virtual
> identity have the role/entitlement associated (and the account is
> correctly linked), should a recomputation fix this?
>
> Maybe we have a wrong resource configuration?
>
> Il 08 set 2017 7:44 PM, Martin Lízner - AMI Praha a.s.
> <martin.lizner at ami.cz> <mailto:martin.lizner at ami.cz> ha scritto:
>
> Hi, simple user recompute should do it. E.g. open user in GUI,
> check the reconcile checbox and hit save. Anyway I also
> recommend upgrading to the latest (3.6, soon 3.6.1) mp version. M.
>
>
> *Martin Lízner*
> solution architect
>
> gsm: [+420] 737 745 571
> e-mail: martin.lizner at ami.cz <mailto:martin.lizner at ami.cz>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> AMI Praha a.s.
> Pláničkova 11
> 162 00 Praha 6
> tel.: [+420] 274 783 239
> web: www.ami.cz <http://www.ami.cz/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.ami.cz/images/podpis/ami_logo.gif
>
>
>
> AMI Praha a.s. <http://www.skyidentity.com/>
>
>
> Textem tohoto e-mailu podepisující neslibuje uzavřít ani
> neuzavírá za společnost AMI Praha a.s.
> jakoukoliv smlouvu. Každá smlouva, pokud bude uzavřena, musí
> mít výhradně písemnou formu.
>
> 2017-09-08 18:43 GMT+02:00 Marco Benucci <m.benucci at nsr.it
> <mailto:m.benucci at nsr.it>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> we have midpoint 3.4 and an AD resource with configured
> entitlements.
>
> Now, I still do not know why, but on AD many users have
> lost their membership of a role. Fortunately in midPoint
> we still have the role/entitlement associated to all the
> right users.
>
> Is there a way to force midPoint to reevaluate the
> entitlement association to add again users to theri group?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> midPoint mailing list
> midPoint at lists.evolveum.com
> <mailto:midPoint at lists.evolveum.com>
> http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> midPoint mailing list
>
> midPoint at lists.evolveum.com <mailto:midPoint at lists.evolveum.com>
>
> http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> midPoint mailing list
> midPoint at lists.evolveum.com
> http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.evolveum.com/pipermail/midpoint/attachments/20170908/36e93dc6/attachment.htm>
More information about the midPoint
mailing list