[midPoint] validityStatus changing validTo date

Radovan Semancik radovan.semancik at evolveum.com
Tue Jan 24 10:23:33 CET 2017


Hi,

You are right. You should not change validityStatus or effectiveStatus. 
MidPoint should recompute that automatically. I haven't had chance to 
have a closer look at the issue. But it looks like a bug. Could you 
create a jira for that please? Please compile the information in the 
jira description or just point to the relevant mailing list messages. I 
will look at that issue as soon as I can find a bit of time.

-- 
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com



On 01/23/2017 10:31 PM, Nicolas Rossi wrote:
> Maybe this could help to the midPoint developers: we added some logs 
> to the ActivationComputer class. We have a disabled user and when we 
> change the validTo value from the User Template, the 
> *getEffectiveStatus() returns ENABLED*
> ​ but the user is still disabled.
>
> Current value:
>  <activation>
> <effectiveStatus>disabled</effectiveStatus>
> <validTo>2016-04-30T00:00:00.000-03:00</validTo>
> <validityStatus>after</validityStatus>
> <disableTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:49:49.776-03:00</disableTimestamp>
> <enableTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:49:09.338-03:00</enableTimestamp>
> <validityChangeTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:49:49.776-03:00</validityChangeTimestamp>
>  </activation>
>
> After modification​
>
>    <activation>
> <effectiveStatus>disabled</effectiveStatus>
> <validTo>2017-02-01T00:00:00.000-03:00</validTo>
> <validityStatus>after</validityStatus>
>       <disableTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:49:49.776-03:00</disableTimestamp>
>       <enableTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:49:09.338-03:00</enableTimestamp>
>       
> <validityChangeTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:49:49.776-03:00</validityChangeTimestamp>
>    </activation>
>
> ​It sounds like a bug. Should I open it on JIRA ?
>>
>
> Ing Nicolás Rossi
> Identicum S.A.
> Jorge Newbery 3226
> Tel: +54 (11) 4552-3050
> www.identicum.com <http://www.identicum.com>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Rodrigo Yanis <ryanis at identicum.com 
> <mailto:ryanis at identicum.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello everyone,
>
>     Extending the case exposed by Nicolás, we also added a mapping on
>     the User Template to target on the administrativeStatus attribute
>     the following way (simplified):
>
>         <mapping>
>                 ...
>                 <expression>
>                    <script>
>                      
>         <language>http://midpoint.evolveum.com/xml/ns/public/expression/language#Groovy
>         <http://midpoint.evolveum.com/xml/ns/public/expression/language#Groovy></language>
>                       <code>
>                       import
>         com.evolveum.midpoint.xml.ns._public.common.common_3.ActivationStatusType;
>
>                   ...
>                   return ActivationStatusType.DISABLED;
>          </code>
>                    </script>
>                 </expression>
>                 <target>
>         * <c:path>$user/activation/administrativeStatus</c:path>*
>                 </target>
>              </mapping>
>
>
>     When the user is imported disabled from HR, effectiveStatus
>     remains enabled even though validTo is expired and
>     administrativeStatus is set to disabled on UserTemplates' account.
>
>         <activation>
>         * <administrativeStatus>disabled</administrativeStatus>
>         ** <effectiveStatus>enabled</effectiveStatus>*
>          <validFrom>2013-07-20T00:00:00.000-03:00</validFrom>
>         * <validTo>2015-07-20T00:00:00.000-03:00</validTo>
>         ** <validityStatus>in</validityStatus>*
>          <enableTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:17:36.013-03:00</enableTimestamp>
>          <validityChangeTimestamp>2017-01-23T16:17:36.013-03:00</validityChangeTimestamp>
>           </activation>
>
>
>     Thankful for any advise,
>
>
>     *Rodrigo Yanis.*
>     Identicum S.A.
>     Jorge Newbery 3226
>     Tel: +54 (11) 4824-9971
>     ryanis at identicum.com <mailto:ryanis at identicum.com>
>     www.identicum.com <http://www.identicum.com/>
>
>     2017-01-23 10:21 GMT-03:00 Nicolas Rossi <nrossi at identicum.com
>     <mailto:nrossi at identicum.com>>:
>
>         Hi guys, we have reproduced this issue on a fresh install of
>         midPoint 3.5. These are the steps to reproduce it:
>
>          1. Extended the schema with 2 attributes (a flag and a date)
>             → user.xsd
>          2. Created a UserTemplate mapping the custom date to the
>             validTo if the flag is active. → user_template.xml
>          3. Assigned the UserTemplate as the default template for users.
>          4. Create a user
>          5. Modify the user setting the flag and a date before today
>
>         Result:
>
>           * The validTo date is mapped correctly
>           * The user is still enabled
>
>         Regards,
>
>
>
>         Ing Nicolás Rossi
>         Identicum S.A.
>         Jorge Newbery 3226
>         Tel: +54 (11) 4552-3050
>         www.identicum.com <http://www.identicum.com>
>
>         On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Nicolas Rossi
>         <nrossi at identicum.com <mailto:nrossi at identicum.com>> wrote:
>
>             Hi guys, we have a User Template that defines the validTo
>             date evaluating 2 different dates. When a user is active
>             and the calculated validTo date is before today the user
>             is not being disabled by midpoint as we expected. I found
>             a little difference between this user and other one not
>             handled by the user template, on the activation node it
>             has validityStatus=in instead of validityStatus=after:
>
>             User disabled OK (changed from GUI, not from the
>             UserTemplate):
>
>             <activation>
>             *<effectiveStatus>disabled</effectiveStatus>*
>             *<validTo>2017-01-15T00:00:00.000-03:00</validTo>*
>             *<validityStatus>after</validityStatus>*
>             <disableTimestamp>2017-01-22T08:24:48.970-03:00</disableTimestamp>
>             <enableTimestamp>2017-01-22T08:24:31.529-03:00</enableTimestamp>
>             <validityChangeTimestamp>2017-01-22T08:24:48.970-03:00</validityChangeTimestamp>
>              </activation>
>
>             User not being disabled (changed from UserTemplate):
>
>             <activation>
>             *<effectiveStatus>enabled</effectiveStatus>*
>             *<validTo>2017-01-15T00:00:00.000-03:00</validTo>*
>             *<validityStatus>in</validityStatus>*
>                  
>             <disableTimestamp>2017-01-22T08:13:40.530-03:00</disableTimestamp>
>                  
>             <enableTimestamp>2017-01-22T08:13:58.962-03:00</enableTimestamp>
>                  
>             <validityChangeTimestamp>2017-01-22T08:13:58.962-03:00</validityChangeTimestamp>
>              </activation>
>
>             ​Should I set the validityStatus on the UserTemplate?
>
>             Regards,
>
>
>             Ing Nicolás Rossi
>             Identicum S.A.
>             Jorge Newbery 3226
>             Tel: +54 (11) 4552-3050
>             www.identicum.com <http://www.identicum.com>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         midPoint mailing list
>         midPoint at lists.evolveum.com <mailto:midPoint at lists.evolveum.com>
>         http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint
>         <http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     midPoint mailing list
>     midPoint at lists.evolveum.com <mailto:midPoint at lists.evolveum.com>
>     http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint
>     <http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> midPoint mailing list
> midPoint at lists.evolveum.com
> http://lists.evolveum.com/mailman/listinfo/midpoint

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.evolveum.com/pipermail/midpoint/attachments/20170124/fd6f379d/attachment.htm>


More information about the midPoint mailing list